The QWERTY key layout was designed to address mechanical constraints of typewriters rather than typing speed, noting alternatives like Dvorak and Colemak and the social barriers to switching
The Narrative
In the late 19th century keyboard layouts were arranged to reduce mechanical arm jams in typewriters. Keys were positioned to slow down certain common letter pairings rather than to maximize typing speed, producing the QWERTY layout that persisted as a standard despite technological change.
Alternative layouts such as Dvorak and Colemak were developed to improve comfort and theoretical speed by reducing finger movement. Adoption remains limited because switching requires retraining, device and software compatibility, and institutional inertia—factors that often outweigh the potential gains for most users.
History often determines standards more than technical merit. Before attempting a full layout change, focus on practical improvements—custom shortcuts, typing practice, ergonomic setup—which typically yield measurable benefits without the social and operational costs of a wholesale switch.